Monday, July 6, 2009
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Forest managers must do much more than plan. We must be protectors and stewards of the land. To achieve this goal, many of us use an approach to management that is sometimes referred to as ecosystem-based forest management.
What are ecosystems?
Generally speaking, an ecosystem is a community of interacting organisms. Ecosystems generally have similar site conditions (i.e., soil, climate, moisture), and the species in a particular ecosystem are all adapted to these shared environmental conditions. Ecosystems vary from one place to another because of differences in physical characteristics (geology, soils, landforms, topography, and surface materials) and biological characteristics (vegetation, animals, and microbes).
Ecosystems can be found on land (terrestrial) or in the water (aquatic) and can be very large (for example the Earth) or relatively small (a local forest). Ecosystems usually overlap and are interconnected or are dependent on one another through various processes—for instance the water cycle.
The Acadian Forest, where we live, is an ecosystem that contains many different ecosystems. The mix of tree species and other vegetation within each Acadian Forest ecosystem depends on various factors:
- site and soil conditions (aka moisture and nutrient regimes. For instance, wet to very dry sites and nutrient poor to rich fertile sites);
- climate or microclimate (a microclimate is an area where the climate is different from the climate in surrounding areas);
- the way humans have used the land (aka land-use patterns or human disturbances),
- the frequency with which the ecosystem experiences naturally occurring events such as high winds, fires, lightning, and insect outbreaks (aka natural disturbance regimes); and
- the forest’s current stage of development—that is, whether it is just beginning to grow back, is mature, is somewhere in between, or is a mixture of stages. This process of development from early stages to later stages, which all ecosystems go through, is referred to as natural or ecological succession.
How can we identify ecosystems in Nova Scotia?
In Nova Scotia we have two newly available tools that provide a good basis for identifying ecosystems across our landscape.
The Ecological Land Classification (ELC) for Nova Scotia uses information on climate, geology, soils, and so on to create maps of ecological groupings within the province at three levels: ecoregion, ecodistrict, and ecosection. The Acadian Forest Ecozone is divided first into 9 main ecoregions. These ecoregions are differentiated primarily by elevation and proximity to the ocean. For example, the Valley and Central Lowlands Ecoregion essentially extends from Digby to Truro surrounding the Minas Basin. The distinguishing feature of this ecoregion, as outlined in the ELC manual is that the ecoregion is “sheltered from coastal climatic influences with warmer summer temperatures and milder winters than elsewhere in the province”. These conditions bring forth a unique combination of soil and vegetation types.
The ecoregions are further subdivided into ecodistricts as classified by distinct combinations of geology, landforms, soils and vegetation. There are a total of 40 ecodistricts in Nova Scotia. The Valley and Central Lowlands Ecoregion, for example, contains 3 ecodistricts: the Annapolis Valley Ecodistrict (extending from Digby to Canning), the Central Lowlands Ecodistrict (includes much of Hants County), and the Minas Lowlands (extending from east of Truro to Bass River).
A more detailed, localized way of classifying a forest or forest stand is by ecotype. Ecotypes are broad ecological groupings with similar moisture and nutrient regimes that are reflected in similar growth (productivity) capabilities. Forest Ecosystem Classification (FEC) manuals for the central, west, and eastern regions of Nova Scotia define forest ecotypes according to their dominant soil and vegetation types. (The manuals for the west and east are interim versions. The NSDNR provincial manual is scheduled for publication in 2011.) They contain vegetation and soil identification keys, descriptions, photographs, and corresponding management interpretations for the various vegetation and soil types found in Nova Scotia.
Soil types are classified by moisture (wet, moist, fresh or dry), texture (coarse, medium, fine) and sometimes fertility (poor, medium, rich). Soil types can be easily identified in the field by digging a small soil pit and using the keys provided in the FEC manual to determine texture and type.
The photo above shows a clear, large American beech in a hardwood old growth forest near Mabou. It is estimated that these trees are about 200 years old, raising questions about why this tree was not affected by the beech canker disease that was introduced into Nova Scotia in the early 1900s.
Vegetation types are described in terms of dominant overstory tree species cover and understory vegetation species. Vegetation communities and particular species can be used as indicators of site productivity. For instance, a ground vegetation mix of Red baneberry, Rose twisted stalk, Oak fern and Beaked hazelnut is an indicator of soil richness and a site that will support a shade-tolerant hardwood mix forest of Sugar maple, Yellow birch, White ash, and American beech. On the other hand, a ground vegetation mix of Cinnamon fern, Dwarf raspberry, Starflower, Sphagnum moss, False holly and Lambkill is suited to wet and poor-to-medium fertility sites, thus serves as an indicator of a site that will support a mainly coniferous forest of Red spruce, Black spruce, and Balsam fir with a mix of Red maple, White birch, Yellow birch, and White pine.
The photo above shows a Yellow birch in the same old growth forest pictured in the previous photo. This forest was actually close to being entirely harvested until, at the last minute, it was purchased by the neighbouring forest owner. The trees stretch 22 meters into the sky. This forest is truly breathtaking to walk through, particularly when the leaves are off the trees.
Using the vegetation and soil type keys provided in the manual, ecosystems are classified into 10 ecotypes. These range from dry-poor conifer (i.e., rock barren) to very rich deciduous (i.e., floodplains). Once the ecotype of a site has been identified, the FEC manual provides management interpretations that address potential and operational hazards, including hazards associated with the particular soil type. Using the manual, the forest manager can develop appropriate prescriptions to ensure that activities on the ground are a success and not detrimental to the ecosystem.
For instance, an ecosystem with Soil type 12 as classified in the FEC manual (“Rich moist, fine—medium textured”) is prone to rutting, compaction, and erosion. Thus management recommendations made using an ecosystem-base approach will include measures to minimize this risk. Protecting the soil will, in turn, ensure that the site remains productive for many years to come.
In ecosystem-based forest management, tools such as these are very valuable. They are used to identify and apply management interpretations that reflect opportunities and address hazards and operational limitations associated with a site’s specific ecosystem (ecotype) . Incorporating such information into recommendations and operational planning will limit possible damage from harvesting and help to maintain both overall ecosystem health and site productivity for the long term. Together, the ELC and the FEC provide a valuable perspective on a woodlot at the landscape and forest stand level, allowing the forest manager to fully understand ecological processes at play.
What is ecosystem-based forest management?
In ecosystem-based forest management, forest managers try to determine the natural ecological process that should be occurring on a particular site. We then try to protect these processes while also achieving landowner’s goals, which may include not only timber production but also conservation, recreation, aesthetics, and other resource values and benefits. The key principles of EBFM are:
- Manage the natural forest
- Mimic natural processes, including natural disturbances
- Maintain multiple forest values, benefits and uses
- Prescribe site-specific treatments
- Focus efforts where they will yield the best returns
- Improve the quality and value of individual trees over time
- Avoid predictable hazards
- Maintain and protect long-term site productivity
- Maintain and protect ecosystem functions and health
This approach to forest management respects the dynamic, changing character of the forest community and forest landscape. It takes a more holistic view of the forest and is especially appropriate for landowners whose goals and objectives are based on multiple values and use.
This item is drawn from two columns I wrote for the Nova Scotia Woodlot Owners and Operators' "Update" newsletter and from a presentation Sandy Hyde made to the NSWOOA Annual General Meeting in April 2009.
Sunday, May 3, 2009
I took these pictures of mayflowers (above and right) on a woodlot on the Lahave River near Bakers Settlement. Mayflowers like to grow in harsh environments and are not too picky about how rich the sites are. The mayflowers I have seen lately are in clearcuts, along roadsides ... basically in the open. They smell so nice and are a sure sign of spring.
Above, a wood turtle enjoys spring sunshine on a deadhead, which is what we call a dead log sticking up out the water. Later on that afternoon there were a pair of them. I couldn't get a picture of the pair because they dipped into the water as we approached them. This photo was taken during an overnight camping trip in the Cloud Lake Wilderness Area, shown below.
This was our camp site. It was a nice little spot. Don't worry, we ensured that our camp fire was good and out. Sandy and I both have lots of experience with fire fighting and understanding fire behavior.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
The illustration above shows a woodlot stand map developed as part of a forest management plan by Picea Forestry Consulting. The woodlot stand map results from aerial photo interpretation and the forest inventory completed on the ground. The number of stand units reflects differences in species composition and age classes that have resulted from past disturbances (either harvesting or naturally caused disturbance). The number of stand units also reflects different site and soil conditions in terms of terrain characteristics (i.e., slope) and soil drainage. For instance, on this woodlot map stand, units 11 & 15 are classed as red maple swamps and these areas are wet for most of the year.
Besides outlining the number of stand units, the map also indicates available access to and within the woodlot and where watercourses are located. For this woodlot, a main public road serves as the north property boundary. This not only serves as a good property boundary but also provides ideal access to the woodlot. The woodlot trails, represented by red dotted lines, provide sufficient access within the woodlot in between the swamps, and a bridge was built to cross the brook in stand unit 20.
The woodlot stand map is an ideal reference point to what each stand contains, the priority level for attention (treatment), and recommended activities for the stands.
Questions & answers
How is a management plan developed?
Six main steps are usually required to complete a management plan for a woodlot owner:
- Understand the woodlot owner's short- and long-term goals and objectives.·
- Obtain and interpret aerial photos to delineate stands and determine the number of stands to assess. Use contour maps and ecological classification maps to help determine forest stands.
- Conduct the forest inventory via a field cruise (assessment) of each stand. The forest inventory describes each stand in terms of species composition, age, number of age classes, height, density, vigor, growing conditions, wood product volumes, potential, and so on. The inventory also describes terrain and soil characteristics, soil drainage, number of watercourses and seepages, land capability, environmentally sensitive areas, windfall risk, access, and usually boundary line conditions.
- Develop the final woodlot map, calculating stand areas and wood product volumes for each stand and for the entire woodlot.
- Write the plan, including both descriptive and prescriptive information.
- Have the woodlot owner review the plan and then discuss it one on one.
What does a management plan contain?
Forest managers combine the information collected in a forest inventory with knowledge of your values, experience, and needs to complete the forest management plan. We:·
- identify priority areas for treatment (where to focus efforts first);
- recommend appropriate harvesting and silviculture activities, including techniques that aim to reach your objectives;
- recommend methods of harvest and extraction; timing of activity, access, and operating considerations that aim to limit ground disturbance to ensure long-term productivity and ensure ecosystem health;
- indicate stands/areas and treatments that are eligible for silviculture funding; and
- identify areas suitable for recreation activities such as trails, camp sites, and rest stops.
How much does a management plan cost?
The cost of a management plan depends on amount of detail desired, management objectives, acreage and amount of productive land, the variability of stands, and the number of stands to assess. The cost of a management plan for a 100-acre woodlot that is mostly productive with a variety of stands might be in the range of $750 to $2,000. Although a management plan can be considered a significant investment, woodlot owners often find that the benefits are worthy more than the costs.
Note: This article previously appeared in an online newsletter published by the Nova Scotia Woodlot Owners and Operators Association.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
The photos shown here were taken on a level area of a slope in the Cape Breton Hills between Mabou and Inverness, but I have also found these in the Cobequid Hills on level ground and along streams. The photos were probably taken around the first of June.
Fiddleheads are just one example of the many nontimber forest products (NTFs) that our Acadian Forest can provide. And they are a tasty treat for the woodland owner!
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
The photo shows a young Yellow birch sapling, about 4 meters tall and of good form, quality and vigor. It's growing underneath a canopy of White spruce and Tamarack larch that are approximately 45 years of age and 17 meters tall. Note that it's growing under a small gap in the upper canopy and is reaching for the light.
This site has good capability for growing high-value trees. The White spruce and particularly the larch could already be harvested for fair-to-high quality log products; but they are still young and can certainly grow longer. In addition, younger classes of both Yellow birch and some White ash that are scattered throughout the site. These are in varying stages, ranging from 3-8 meters tall.
Our recommendation for this area was to begin a light harvest of individual trees, choosing those of the poorest quality including branchy White spruce and some of the forked-topped larch. These trees will not increase in value, and gradually removing them will open gaps in the canopy. This in turn will increase growing space and provide light for the tolerant hardwoods emerging underneath, encouraging their growth.
It will be crucial to keep the harvest light, removing no more than 20-25% of the existing wood volume, because the younger trees need to remain sheltered in order to prevent damage that could be caused by heavy snow and ice. Presently the crowns of the White spruce and larch hold most of the snow and ice that falls on the site, protecting the saplings growing underneath. If too many of these older trees were removed, the young trees would have to take the full weight and would likely break or lean over. These younger trees will need to attain a diameter of at least 15 cm before they will be able to handle this weight.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
There are two main approaches to forest management—even-aged management and uneven-aged management (UAM)—although sometimes people practice a mixture of the two. Ultimately the choice of which approach to use will depend on forest condition and management objectives, and can change over time because of circumstances (for instance, devastation caused by hurricane) and/or as management objectives change.
One important difference between UAM and even-aged management is that whereas even-aged management tends to focus on “stands” (conglomerations of similar-aged trees of similar species), UAM tends to focus on individual trees within a particular area, with a goal of growing high-quality trees that will have high value when harvested. This allows the woodlot owner to practice selection management, earning a continual modest income over time while maintaining other forest values such as wildlife habitat and recreation.
In contrast, with even-aged management, entire stands are likely to be cut at one time. This may produce a high financial return in the year the harvesting is done, but other values may be sacrificed and the stand may not produce income again for decades.
In UAM, areas within a woodlot are separated into management units based on ecological factors such as site and soil conditions, ecotype, and previous disturbance/harvest practices. A key consideration is the presence of potentially high-value trees (often referred to as crop trees) and potential for growing such trees.
Intermediate and mature crop trees are assessed based on considerations such as straightness/form, vigor, lack of limbs, lack of scars or other defects, and ultimately species marketability now and into the future. But it is also important to recognize potential crop trees that may be regenerating under canopy, particularly where openings have occurred allowing sunlight to penetrate to the forest floor. This requires knowledge of tree silvics (what our various native tree species need to grow and flourish), natural succession patterns (or stages of forest development from early to late stages), and the disturbance regime that is natural to the ecotype and ecodistrict where the woodlot is found within the Acadian Forest Region.
Here are some good resources on tree silvics and Acadian Forest ecosystems. The following can be purchased from the Nova Forest Alliance:
- Forest Ecosystem Classification of Nova Scotia’s Model Forest. An edition for the central region and interim versions for the eastern and western regions are available. A final version is expected in 2009.
- A Guide to Identifying and Managing Nova Scotia Hardwoods
- Field Manual for Forest Ecosystem Classification. Although this is available for download, it is a very big file. Single copies of are available free of charge by writing to: Library, Dept. of Natural Resources , P.O. Box 698, Halifax, N.S. B3J 2T9; e-mailing email@example.com; or from local offices of the Department of Natural Resources.
- Forest Soil Types of Nova Scotia: Identification, Description, and Interpretation. Available online, and single printed copies are also available free from the same source as the field manual listed above.
- Tolerant Hardwood Management Guide. Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources Report FOR 2007-8 No. 84.
- Silvics of North America. Vol. 1: Conifers, Vol. 2: Hardwoods. 1990. Agriculture Handbook 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
- Interactive Guide to Common Trees of Nova Scotia.
Saturday, January 31, 2009
In this blog, I hope to share some of the knowledge and experience I've gained working woodlot owners who are dedicated to managing their woodlots not only for their own benefit but also for the benefit of future generations. These woodlot owners inspire me, and I hope they will inspire you too.
Above, that's me in a stand of hemlocks, pines and Yellow birch that are more than 120 years old. I am taking a forest inventory and notes to help make recommendations for this beautiful woodlot located along a lake in Lunenburg county. We recommended a light selection harvest to open up the canopy to encourage some additional age classes in order to continuously maintain forest cover in the area, which has lots of recreational potential.
To start, here is some information about me. I have been the general manager and owner of Picea Forestry Consulting and Woodlot Services for 9 years. Picea offers a wide range of professional woodlot management services. We have written management plans for two winners of Provincial Woodlot Owner of the Year, helped organize provincial field days in connection with the WOY program, and developed and administered forest stewardship programs for Registered Buyers as required under the Nova Scotia Forest Sustainability Regulations. Currently we are involved in an project funded by the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources to help Nova Scotia woodlot owners bring their woodlots into certification.
In 2008 I coordinated a NSDNR-funded outreach project designed to educate Nova Scotia woodlot owners about uneven-aged management. During this highly successful project I was able to talk to hundreds of woodlot owners in all regions of the province, both in groups and one on one, and made site visits to woodlots throughout the province.
Previous to starting my own business, I was silviculture supervisor for MacTara Ltd., of Upper Musquodoboit, Crown Land/Wildlife Forest Technician for the DNR in Lawrencetown, and a private land forest technician for the DNR in Digby.
I have a broad view and understanding of the various values and objectives woodlot owners have for the forest, the diverse range of forest conditions and ecosystems that are present throughout Nova Scotia; the challenges of management, and the potential that our forest holds in terms of producing high-quality forest products and non-timber forest products, as well as recreational and educational activities. I am passionate about working with private woodlot owners to help them realize the full range of values and benefits our forest is capable of providing.
I welcome your comments on this blog.